Let me do some definitions before i start with my post..
This is indeed making me frustrated and curious right now.

Lets start from this:
Definition of JUSTICE-
1. the quality of being just; righteousness, equitableness, or moral rightness: to uphold the justice of a cause.
2. rightfulness or lawfulness, as of a claim or title; justness of ground or reason: to complain with justice.
3. the moral principle determining just conduct.
4. conformity to this principle, as manifested in conduct; just conduct, dealing, or treatment.
5. the administering of deserved punishment or reward.
6. the maintenance or administration of what is just by law, as by judicial or other proceedings: a court of justice.
7. judgment of persons or causes by judicial process: to administer justice in a community.
8. a judicial officer; a judge or magistrate.
9. (initial capital letter) Also called Justice Department. the Department of Justice.

Definition of MORAL-
1. of, pertaining to, or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right and wrong; ethical: moral attitudes.
2. expressing or conveying truths or counsel as to right conduct, as a speaker or a literary work; moralizing: a moral novel.
3. founded on the fundamental principles of right conduct rather than on legalities, enactment, or custom: moral obligations.
4. capable of conforming to the rules of right conduct: a moral being.
5. conforming to the rules of right conduct (opposed to immoral ): a moral man.
6. virtuous in sexual matters; chaste.
7. of, pertaining to, or acting on the mind, feelings, will, or character: moral support.
8. resting upon convincing grounds of probability; virtual: a moral certainty.
9. the moral teaching or practical lesson contained in a fable, tale, experience, etc.
10. the embodiment or type of something.
11. morals, principles or habits with respect to right or wrong conduct.




As you can see from the definitions up there..
I am sure it is very clear about what does these two words mean.
But I am right now, very curious about law of justice.
Encounter with 2 O today.
Didn't manage to find all these points from them...
Are they qualified to be one of the O?
I don't understand..REALLY REALLY DON'T UNDERSTAND.
can someone tell me the answer?


Let me tell you about my small ambition.
My ambition is to be a police officer in future..I AM SERIOUS.
but..today's encounter have let me think otherwise.
DO YOU KNOW WHY?
these two O..
did the right thing to maintain the law by stopping those people from breaking the rules.
however, they did something that is wrong..
they have did something that shouldn't be done for being an O.
let me talk about MORAL.
look carefully. it is MORAL..
why did i add this into this situation is because, i find it linked to justice.
as when we talk about moral,
we talk about principles or habits with respect to right or wrong conduct.
but..these O did something with no respect at all..
they have no respect to the person that was caught.
they shown one attitude that an officer should not have done.
i find it hard to believe when i get to know their status.
ok let me bring this situation to the actual situation.
firstly, O should show their status before taking actions towards things.
these two did not do that.
they simply start questioning, take down particulars.
but started showing attitude, just because the person being caught said something like "Lah,Leh,Lor"?
I don't understand what trigger their anger that they cannot stand that..
and as we know that, all these words have been used by most of us.
is it an offence to say these words?
i really don't understand.
I am still fine with it.
what i am curious is,
why they did not let us have the right to speak?
interrupting us when we wanted to explain out..
explanation also counted as offence?
i wonder where does the fairness lies on.
took down particulars, went off without letting the person to know who are they.
is this the right thing to be O?
the person that was caught, eventually chased them.
curious about who are they,
one of the Os replied in a rude manner.
ARE YOU HAPPY?SATISFIED NOW?
oh my..
is this the way to speak?
from the way he communicate,
i had therefore concluded that,
justice is no longer there..
there was no sense of moral..
the person being caught was hurt morally.
why is this happening?
i wonder if there is anything that can change it..
i only wanted an answer..
that is why i didn't show who are those person.
so can someone please tell me what is happening?
and what can we do to stop it?


sorry to say that,
all answers should not be commented on this blog.
please msn me so that i could discuss the answer with you.
thanks =)